Posts tagged ‘open innovation’

March 8, 2009

Opening MP Voting Records: how?

Interesting article on opening MP voting records “soon” but how effective will this be?

While not as interesting as the US given our more traditional party-disciplined voting, one can imagine some interesting data mashups. For example one could create a map linking voting records with government spending projects, financial contributions and media coverage by riding.

Will be very interesting to see what format the data is in – locked in PDFs as David Eaves has mentioned in his blog post about Vancouver, or tagged and available for anyone to access and manipulate programatically as he shows for Toronto here

Also interesting is the reference to “A Canadian site, run by a B.C. man in his spare time, tracked voting records, but it was often out of date.” which I assume means http://www.howdtheyvote.ca This would be a perfect opportunity for a collaboration between someone like How’d They Vote and the government agency responsible for publishing the data. Here is someone who has already, with no government funding, put up an interactive site to explore this data – along with quotes, bills raised, statistics and so on. Seems pretty up to date to me, with last voting data from Feb 12 2009

UPDATE: After posting this to the vanchangecamp Google Group, Cory Horner (the “BC man” in question) responded saying:

Ouch… I am past tense — but I guess perception is reality, since while all votes have been added to the database within 48 hours lately (and appear in the stats), they don’t show up in the votes listing until they are marked as “relevant” and attached to a bill.

It was updated on Monday, and the front page shows the date it was last updated.

Interestingly, Cory goes on to say:

Also, looking for thoughts on a development version of our API here:

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=516782FB-2AF1-4980-AC97-36F619A90ECC%40canoe42.ca&forum_name=howdtheyvote-developers

This is exactly the kind of open access required to enable third party application development. Imagine the possibilities!

Finally, Cory recommends this article in The Hill Times for more detailed coverage.

November 5, 2008

Next open idea: Participatory Research

Provide technology and communications tools to allow crowdsourcing of research and data collection.

Today’s crowdsourcing efforts tend to be systems where the public can come to a site and help solve problems or contribute computer time per SETI@home or the World Community Grid.

In many cases, the help that is needed in in data collection. Whether researching broadband access prices in communities around the country, collecting water quality samples worldwide or monitoring political media buying, there is a need for technology to allow public data collection, storage and analysis.

Many organizations cannot afford the wide-scale data collection required to fully understand and communicate issues. Small organizations trying to do research and communicate their impact to the public benefit. Society as a whole benefits from the resulting research.

First steps are to identify an issue to pilot – e.g. communications research. Partner with organizations in that sector along with groups like the World Community Grid. Develop prototype technology platform

Measures of success: compare pre- and post-program research from selected organizations, data set sizes, etc.

October 28, 2008

Open innovation ideas: Building reclamation social enterprise

As part of the Google Power of 10 to the 100th contest, I submitted 11 ideas and thought this would be a good, if belated way, to follow up on my last post about sharing ideas for comment. I hope that anyone interested will comment, contact me, or take the ideas and run with them.

Building reclamation social enterprise

Idea: Social enterprise reclaiming timber, windows and siding from buildings demolished in gentrifying neighbourhoods providing revenue and job skills

As neigbhourhoods transition from commercial/industrial to residential, many old warehouses and commercial buildings are torn down. These buildings often contain valuable timber components – beams, framing, windows, etc. This project would create a social enterprise to reclaim these components, sell to contractors and consumers and provide trade training to local residents

Two problems are addressed here. First, gentrifying neigbhourhoods are being demolished and valuable dollars are leaving. Second, residents do not have employment and training opportunities Local residents benefit through job creation and revenue staying in the community rather than dispersing to surrounding areas.

Next steps: Identify target communities. Engage with local community economic development organizations. Partner with local construction trade associations

Outcomes and measurements: The optimal outcome will be increased employment opportunities in local areas, reduced economic leakage from the community and an increase in skilled jobs vacancies filled by local residents

Partners: Building Opportunities with Business, Enterprising Non-profits

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.